Clare Lombardelli is close astir the problems of economics teaching (‘It’s beauteous bad’: Bank of England apical authoritative connected the deficiency of pistillate economics students, 5 May), and it’s illustrated close determination successful her nonfiction – the thought that a quarter-point chopped successful the Bank of England basal complaint is going to marque overmuch quality successful the contiguous volatile Trumpist world.
The obsession with involvement rates by fiscal and economics wonks has ever been a wonderment to behold. Acres of newsprint are expended connected it. But it was the large JK Galbraith who enactment it into position erstwhile helium said that people, companies and banks volition spend, get oregon lend erstwhile they consciousness assured to bash so, and not due to the fact that of wherever the involvement complaint is astatine immoderate fixed moment.
Proof of this came erstwhile the Bank had the complaint down astatine a historical debased of 0.5% for a decennary nether David Cameron and George Osborne, yet the system resolutely refused to decently retrieve and bumped stubbornly on connected the bottom. This was due to the fact that politicians’ fiscal austerity policies had sucked retired assurance and demand.
Lombardelli is surely close erstwhile she says that students should beryllium fixed the wider societal perspective. Trumpism is 1 thing, but for years the persistent problems person been the outgo of lodging and poorly paid, insecure jobs. Rectify these and you volition see a genuine betterment that owes small to insignificant tweaks successful the interest rate. And hopefully a caller clump of students who volition spot the benefits personally.
David Redshaw
Saltdean, East Sussex
More teaching of economics to a broader scope of students would of people beryllium a bully thing. But the existent question is whose economics is being taught? I took A-level economics successful a authorities schoolhouse and part-one economics astatine Cambridge. It was each astir the joyousness and the magic of markets, a decennary earlier Margaret Thatcher. It felt similar a gigantic con astatine the time, and we present cognize wherever that got us.
Clare Lombardelli is close that economics is “the champion taxable to recognize societal issues, wherefore things are the mode they are”. But tin it reply the question: what, oregon amended still, who is an system for? Answer that 1 mode and you get neoliberalism, reply it different and you’ve a warring accidental of a much equal, just and sustainable world.
Andrew Webb
London