Old Tafo MP responds after Supreme Court dismisses injunction against CJ removal process

1 week ago 24
06 May 2025 astatine 16:21
Member of Parliament for Old Tafo, Vincent Ekow AssafuahMember of Parliament for Old Tafo, Vincent Ekow Assafuah

The Member of Parliament for Old Tafo, Vincent Ekow Assafuah, has responded to the Supreme Court’s dismissal of his exertion for an injunction seeking to halt the removal process of Chief Justice Gertrude Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo.

The apex court, successful a 3–2 bulk determination delivered connected Tuesday, 6th May, rejected the application. The afloat judgement is expected to beryllium released connected 21st May 2025.

Speaking to journalists aft the ruling, Mr Assafuah expressed disagreement with the determination but said his ineligible squad would await the Court’s elaborate reasoning earlier determining their adjacent steps.

Recommended For YouEntertainment2025-05-06T09:43:55+00:00Ghana’s Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, has warned that the country’s increasing estimation arsenic a enactment hotspot during December could promote illicit enactment and harm its planetary standing.

Alban Bagbin

Sports2025-05-06T15:07:38+00:00Violence broke retired during a Kenyan Premier League lucifer betwixt Shabana FC and Gor Mahia, leaving 66 fans injured earlier kick-off. Details of what happened...

Violent chromatic  combat  leaves 66 shot   fans battling for beingness  successful  Kenya (Video)

Sports2025-05-06T11:57:23+00:00Inter Milan and Barcelona caput into the Champions League semi-final 2nd limb level aft a thrilling 3-3 draw, with some sides eyeing a spot successful the final. Pulse Sports Ghana previews this breathtaking European clash...

 Who past  and stats favour

The Supreme Court has spoken. On the 21st of May, we volition person the afloat reasoning down the ruling, and from there, we volition beryllium successful a amended presumption to determine our adjacent people of action.

I don’t judge this is the extremity of the road. A 3–2 ruling suggests that adjacent wrong the Supreme Court, determination was immoderate merit seen successful the arguments we made.

ALSO READ: Afenyo-Markin petitions IGP to authorisation constabulary serviceman implicit alleged assault

Details of the Ruling

Supreme Court of Ghana

The five-member panel of the Supreme Court comprised Justices Paul Baffoe-Bonnie, Amadu Tanko, and Yonny Kulendi, who formed the majority, with Justices Henrietta Mensa-Bonsu and Ernest Gaewu dissenting.

During the proceedings, counsel for the applicant, erstwhile Attorney-General Godfred Yeboah Dame, objected to the inclusion of Acting Chief Justice, Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie, connected the panel, citing a imaginable struggle of interest. The panel, however, dismissed the objection arsenic lacking merit.

ALSO READ: Mahama plotting to manipulate the instrumentality for a 3rd word bid successful 2028 – NPP alleges

The Court ruled that the objection was unsubstantiated and affirmed its committedness to a just and impartial judicial process.

Mr Dame, reacting to the ruling, expressed reservations implicit the determination to clasp Justice Baffoe-Bonnie connected the panel, describing it arsenic “incongruous” fixed the quality of the case.

Update Me

Subscribe to person regular quality updates.

Accept Terms and Privacy Policy
Read Entire Article